Remove UserLock self-lock check
This is no longer needed since we're not using POSIX locks anymore.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b9c9d34e5
commit
61cc9f34d2
1 changed files with 21 additions and 52 deletions
|
@ -499,12 +499,6 @@ void handleDiffHook(uid_t uid, uid_t gid, Path tryA, Path tryB, Path drvPath, Pa
|
|||
class UserLock
|
||||
{
|
||||
private:
|
||||
/* POSIX locks suck. If we have a lock on a file, and we open and
|
||||
close that file again (without closing the original file
|
||||
descriptor), we lose the lock. So we have to be *very* careful
|
||||
not to open a lock file on which we are holding a lock. */
|
||||
static Sync<PathSet> lockedPaths_;
|
||||
|
||||
Path fnUserLock;
|
||||
AutoCloseFD fdUserLock;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -515,7 +509,6 @@ private:
|
|||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
UserLock();
|
||||
~UserLock();
|
||||
|
||||
void kill();
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -529,9 +522,6 @@ public:
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Sync<PathSet> UserLock::lockedPaths_;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
UserLock::UserLock()
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert(settings.buildUsersGroup != "");
|
||||
|
@ -568,47 +558,34 @@ UserLock::UserLock()
|
|||
|
||||
fnUserLock = (format("%1%/userpool/%2%") % settings.nixStateDir % pw->pw_uid).str();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto lockedPaths(lockedPaths_.lock());
|
||||
if (!lockedPaths->insert(fnUserLock).second)
|
||||
/* We already have a lock on this one. */
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
AutoCloseFD fd = open(fnUserLock.c_str(), O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_CLOEXEC, 0600);
|
||||
if (!fd)
|
||||
throw SysError(format("opening user lock '%1%'") % fnUserLock);
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
if (lockFile(fd.get(), ltWrite, false)) {
|
||||
fdUserLock = std::move(fd);
|
||||
user = i;
|
||||
uid = pw->pw_uid;
|
||||
|
||||
AutoCloseFD fd = open(fnUserLock.c_str(), O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_CLOEXEC, 0600);
|
||||
if (!fd)
|
||||
throw SysError(format("opening user lock '%1%'") % fnUserLock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (lockFile(fd.get(), ltWrite, false)) {
|
||||
fdUserLock = std::move(fd);
|
||||
user = i;
|
||||
uid = pw->pw_uid;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sanity check... */
|
||||
if (uid == getuid() || uid == geteuid())
|
||||
throw Error(format("the Nix user should not be a member of '%1%'")
|
||||
% settings.buildUsersGroup);
|
||||
/* Sanity check... */
|
||||
if (uid == getuid() || uid == geteuid())
|
||||
throw Error(format("the Nix user should not be a member of '%1%'")
|
||||
% settings.buildUsersGroup);
|
||||
|
||||
#if __linux__
|
||||
/* Get the list of supplementary groups of this build user. This
|
||||
is usually either empty or contains a group such as "kvm". */
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.resize(10);
|
||||
int ngroups = supplementaryGIDs.size();
|
||||
int err = getgrouplist(pw->pw_name, pw->pw_gid,
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.data(), &ngroups);
|
||||
if (err == -1)
|
||||
throw Error(format("failed to get list of supplementary groups for '%1%'") % pw->pw_name);
|
||||
/* Get the list of supplementary groups of this build user. This
|
||||
is usually either empty or contains a group such as "kvm". */
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.resize(10);
|
||||
int ngroups = supplementaryGIDs.size();
|
||||
int err = getgrouplist(pw->pw_name, pw->pw_gid,
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.data(), &ngroups);
|
||||
if (err == -1)
|
||||
throw Error(format("failed to get list of supplementary groups for '%1%'") % pw->pw_name);
|
||||
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.resize(ngroups);
|
||||
supplementaryGIDs.resize(ngroups);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
} catch (...) {
|
||||
lockedPaths_.lock()->erase(fnUserLock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -618,14 +595,6 @@ UserLock::UserLock()
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
UserLock::~UserLock()
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto lockedPaths(lockedPaths_.lock());
|
||||
auto erased = lockedPaths->erase(fnUserLock);
|
||||
assert(erased);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void UserLock::kill()
|
||||
{
|
||||
killUser(uid);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue