Better diagnostics if no valid signature found
I downloaded Nix tonight, and immediately broke it by accidentally removing the default binary caching. After figuring this out, I also failed to fix it properly, due to using the wrong key for Nix's default binary cache If the diagnostic message would have been clearer about what/where a "signature" for a "substituter" is + comes from, it probably would have saved me a few hours. Maybe we can save other noobs the same pain?
This commit is contained in:
parent
75654bacc5
commit
971382cab0
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ void PathSubstitutionGoal::tryNext()
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
warn("substituter '%s' does not have a valid signature for path '%s'",
|
warn("substituter '%s' does not have a valid signature for path '%s'",
|
||||||
sub->getUri(), worker.store.printStorePath(storePath));
|
sub->getUri(), worker.store.printStorePath(storePath));
|
||||||
|
warn("verify that your nix.conf contains a correct signature in 'trusted-public-keys' for %s",
|
||||||
|
sub->getUri());
|
||||||
tryNext();
|
tryNext();
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue