configure.ac: remove another uname check
uname checks are not cross-safe. The normalization for Cygwin doesn't need any equivalent for host_os because nothing actually checked whether sys_name was cygwin any more.
This commit is contained in:
parent
43856b0d6d
commit
cff8fd69b6
1 changed files with 21 additions and 24 deletions
45
configure.ac
45
configure.ac
|
@ -32,14 +32,6 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(system, AS_HELP_STRING([--with-system=SYSTEM],[Platform identifier (
|
|||
system="$machine_name-`echo $host_os | "$SED" -e's/@<:@0-9.@:>@*$//g'`";;
|
||||
esac])
|
||||
|
||||
sys_name=$(uname -s | tr 'A-Z ' 'a-z_')
|
||||
|
||||
case $sys_name in
|
||||
cygwin*)
|
||||
sys_name=cygwin
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT($system)
|
||||
AC_SUBST(system)
|
||||
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(SYSTEM, ["$system"], [platform identifier ('cpu-os')])
|
||||
|
@ -63,10 +55,12 @@ AC_SYS_LARGEFILE
|
|||
|
||||
# Solaris-specific stuff.
|
||||
AC_STRUCT_DIRENT_D_TYPE
|
||||
if test "$sys_name" = sunos; then
|
||||
case "$host_os" in
|
||||
solaris*)
|
||||
# Solaris requires -lsocket -lnsl for network functions
|
||||
LDFLAGS="-lsocket -lnsl $LDFLAGS"
|
||||
fi
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Check for pubsetbuf.
|
||||
|
@ -210,21 +204,24 @@ AC_SUBST(HAVE_LIBCPUID, [$have_libcpuid])
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
# Look for libseccomp, required for Linux sandboxing.
|
||||
if test "$sys_name" = linux; then
|
||||
AC_ARG_ENABLE([seccomp-sandboxing],
|
||||
AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-seccomp-sandboxing],[Don't build support for seccomp sandboxing (only recommended if your arch doesn't support libseccomp yet!)
|
||||
]))
|
||||
if test "x$enable_seccomp_sandboxing" != "xno"; then
|
||||
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBSECCOMP], [libseccomp],
|
||||
[CXXFLAGS="$LIBSECCOMP_CFLAGS $CXXFLAGS"])
|
||||
have_seccomp=1
|
||||
AC_DEFINE([HAVE_SECCOMP], [1], [Whether seccomp is available and should be used for sandboxing.])
|
||||
else
|
||||
case "$host_os" in
|
||||
linux*)
|
||||
AC_ARG_ENABLE([seccomp-sandboxing],
|
||||
AS_HELP_STRING([--disable-seccomp-sandboxing],[Don't build support for seccomp sandboxing (only recommended if your arch doesn't support libseccomp yet!)
|
||||
]))
|
||||
if test "x$enable_seccomp_sandboxing" != "xno"; then
|
||||
PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LIBSECCOMP], [libseccomp],
|
||||
[CXXFLAGS="$LIBSECCOMP_CFLAGS $CXXFLAGS"])
|
||||
have_seccomp=1
|
||||
AC_DEFINE([HAVE_SECCOMP], [1], [Whether seccomp is available and should be used for sandboxing.])
|
||||
else
|
||||
have_seccomp=
|
||||
fi
|
||||
;;
|
||||
*)
|
||||
have_seccomp=
|
||||
fi
|
||||
else
|
||||
have_seccomp=
|
||||
fi
|
||||
;;
|
||||
esac
|
||||
AC_SUBST(HAVE_SECCOMP, [$have_seccomp])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue