* Defensive programming against POSIX locking idiocy.
* Simplified realiseSlice().
This commit is contained in:
parent
545145cd58
commit
d99d04e644
3 changed files with 18 additions and 25 deletions
|
@ -240,35 +240,10 @@ void realiseSlice(const FSId & id, FSIdSet pending)
|
||||||
if (fs.type != FState::fsSlice)
|
if (fs.type != FState::fsSlice)
|
||||||
throw Error(format("expected slice in %1%") % (string) id);
|
throw Error(format("expected slice in %1%") % (string) id);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Perhaps all paths already contain the right id? */
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bool missing = false;
|
|
||||||
for (SliceElems::const_iterator i = fs.slice.elems.begin();
|
for (SliceElems::const_iterator i = fs.slice.elems.begin();
|
||||||
i != fs.slice.elems.end(); i++)
|
i != fs.slice.elems.end(); i++)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
SliceElem elem = *i;
|
SliceElem elem = *i;
|
||||||
string id;
|
|
||||||
if (!nixDB.queryString(noTxn, dbPath2Id, elem.path, id)) {
|
|
||||||
if (pathExists(elem.path))
|
|
||||||
throw Error(format("path `%1%' obstructed") % elem.path);
|
|
||||||
missing = true;
|
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
if (parseHash(id) != elem.id)
|
|
||||||
throw Error(format("path `%1%' obstructed") % elem.path);
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!missing) {
|
|
||||||
debug(format("already installed"));
|
|
||||||
return;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* For each element, expand its id at its path. */
|
|
||||||
for (SliceElems::const_iterator i = fs.slice.elems.begin();
|
|
||||||
i != fs.slice.elems.end(); i++)
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
SliceElem elem = *i;
|
|
||||||
debug(format("expanding %1% in `%2%'") % (string) elem.id % elem.path);
|
|
||||||
expandId(elem.id, elem.path, "/", pending);
|
expandId(elem.id, elem.path, "/", pending);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
|
||||||
#include "pathlocks.hh"
|
#include "pathlocks.hh"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* This enables us to check whether are not already holding a lock on
|
||||||
|
a file ourselves. POSIX locks (fcntl) suck in this respect: if we
|
||||||
|
close a descriptor, the previous lock will be closed as well. And
|
||||||
|
there is no way to query whether we already have a lock (F_GETLK
|
||||||
|
only works on locks held by other processes). */
|
||||||
|
static StringSet lockedPaths; /* !!! not thread-safe */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
PathLocks::PathLocks(const Strings & _paths)
|
PathLocks::PathLocks(const Strings & _paths)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* Note that `fds' is built incrementally so that the destructor
|
/* Note that `fds' is built incrementally so that the destructor
|
||||||
|
@ -19,6 +27,9 @@ PathLocks::PathLocks(const Strings & _paths)
|
||||||
string lockPath = path + ".lock";
|
string lockPath = path + ".lock";
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
debug(format("locking path `%1%'") % path);
|
debug(format("locking path `%1%'") % path);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (lockedPaths.find(lockPath) != lockedPaths.end())
|
||||||
|
throw Error(format("already holding lock on `%1%'") % lockPath);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Open/create the lock file. */
|
/* Open/create the lock file. */
|
||||||
int fd = open(lockPath.c_str(), O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666);
|
int fd = open(lockPath.c_str(), O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0666);
|
||||||
|
@ -26,6 +37,7 @@ PathLocks::PathLocks(const Strings & _paths)
|
||||||
throw SysError(format("opening lock file `%1%'") % lockPath);
|
throw SysError(format("opening lock file `%1%'") % lockPath);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fds.push_back(fd);
|
fds.push_back(fd);
|
||||||
|
this->paths.push_back(lockPath);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Lock it. */
|
/* Lock it. */
|
||||||
struct flock lock;
|
struct flock lock;
|
||||||
|
@ -37,6 +49,8 @@ PathLocks::PathLocks(const Strings & _paths)
|
||||||
while (fcntl(fd, F_SETLKW, &lock) == -1)
|
while (fcntl(fd, F_SETLKW, &lock) == -1)
|
||||||
if (errno != EINTR)
|
if (errno != EINTR)
|
||||||
throw SysError(format("acquiring lock on `%1%'") % lockPath);
|
throw SysError(format("acquiring lock on `%1%'") % lockPath);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
lockedPaths.insert(lockPath);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -45,4 +59,7 @@ PathLocks::~PathLocks()
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
for (list<int>::iterator i = fds.begin(); i != fds.end(); i++)
|
for (list<int>::iterator i = fds.begin(); i != fds.end(); i++)
|
||||||
close(*i);
|
close(*i);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for (Strings::iterator i = paths.begin(); i != paths.end(); i++)
|
||||||
|
lockedPaths.erase(*i);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ class PathLocks
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
private:
|
private:
|
||||||
list<int> fds;
|
list<int> fds;
|
||||||
|
Strings paths;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
public:
|
public:
|
||||||
PathLocks(const Strings & _paths);
|
PathLocks(const Strings & _paths);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue