Turns errors like this:
let
throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
in throwMsg "bullshit"
error:
… from call site
at «string»:3:4:
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
| ^
… while calling 'throwMsg'
at «string»:2:14:
1| let
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
| ^
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
… while calling the 'throw' builtin
at «string»:2:17:
1| let
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
| ^
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
error: bullshit invalid bar
into errors like this:
let
throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
in throwMsg "bullshit"
error:
… from call site
at «string»:3:4:
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
| ^
… while calling 'throwMsg'
at «string»:2:14:
1| let
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
| ^
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
… caused by explicit throw
at «string»:2:17:
1| let
2| throwMsg = a: throw (a + " invalid bar");
| ^
3| in throwMsg "bullshit"
error: bullshit invalid bar
Change-Id: I593688928ece20f97999d1bf03b2b46d9ac338cb
While preparing PRs like #9753, I've had to change error messages in
dozens of code paths. It would be nice if instead of
EvalError("expected 'boolean' but found '%1%'", showType(v))
we could write
TypeError(v, "boolean")
or similar. Then, changing the error message could be a mechanical
refactor with the compiler pointing out places the constructor needs to
be changed, rather than the error-prone process of grepping through the
codebase. Structured errors would also help prevent the "same" error
from having multiple slightly different messages, and could be a first
step towards error codes / an error index.
This PR reworks the exception infrastructure in `libexpr` to
support exception types with different constructor signatures than
`BaseError`. Actually refactoring the exceptions to use structured data
will come in a future PR (this one is big enough already, as it has to
touch every exception in `libexpr`).
The core design is in `eval-error.hh`. Generally, errors like this:
state.error("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
.debugThrow<TypeError>()
are transformed like this:
state.error<TypeError>("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
.debugThrow()
The type annotation has moved from `ErrorBuilder::debugThrow` to
`EvalState::error`.
(cherry picked from commit c6a89c1a1659b31694c0fbcd21d78a6dd521c732)
Change-Id: Iced91ba4e00ca9e801518071fb43798936cbd05a
Remove some blank lines from stack traces
(cherry picked from commit cea83544362bd6426e9bc0b7dd0d611c19b0e3fd)
Change-Id: Ic1af8b09e9994d3c69fd3b37ae47a4bb786a15a1
I think it is bad for these reasons when `tests/` contains a mix of
functional and integration tests
- Concepts is harder to understand, the documentation makes a good
unit vs functional vs integration distinction, but when the
integration tests are just two subdirs within `tests/` this is not
clear.
- Source filtering in the `flake.nix` is more complex. We need to
filter out some of the dirs from `tests/`, rather than simply pick
the dirs we want and take all of them. This is a good sign the
structure of what we are trying to do is not matching the structure
of the files.
With this change we have a clean:
```shell-session
$ git show 'HEAD:tests'
tree HEAD:tests
functional/
installer/
nixos/
```
(cherry picked from commit 68c81c737571794f7246db53fb4774e94fcf4b7e)
2023-12-01 12:06:43 -05:00
Renamed from tests/lang/eval-fail-toJSON.err.exp (Browse further)
