sizeof(long) is 4 bytes on i686 GCC.
With ~32 GiB of memory and a page size of 4096, there are 7988420 pages.
(7988420 * 4096) is bigger than INT32_MAX folks.
This has gone unnoticed for 9 years, and only came up thanks to
94ea517db[1] adding integer overflow sensitization checks, which caused
this broken code to emit an illegal instruction, crashing Lix the
instant the buildsystem ran Lix to generate the docs files.
[1]: 94ea517dbe729765b69638190f4bea3f6a632b40
Change-Id: I50bb9ea072aac11b449d79e5d55525887a6e5a99
not doing this will cause transfers that had their readers disappear to
linger. with lingering transfers the curl thread can't shut down, which
will cause nix itself to not shut down until the transfer finishes some
other way (most likely network timeouts). also add a new test for this.
Change-Id: Id2401b3ac85731c824db05918d4079125be25b57
This file is currently manually managed, but will be automated along
with the rest of the release process.
Change-Id: I77839919549aaac73de582b2e563ce3ef914a8cb
mdbook has the unfortunate habit of creating stub files for chapters it
can't find on disk. turn off this helpful feature as it masks errors in
the summary file, and fix a recently introduced instance of this error.
Change-Id: I10d86aac0489c9c494bd5c8a50047415f4d4b18d
If unprivileged userns are *believed* to be disabled (such as with
"kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone = 0"), Lix would previously *give up*
on trying to use a user namespace before actually trying it, even if, in
cases such as unprivileged_userns_clone, it would actually be allowed
since Nix has CAP_SYS_ADMIN when running as daemon.
(see, e.g. 25d4709a4f)
We changed it to actually try it first, and then diagnose possible
causes, and also to be more loud about the whole thing, using warnings
instead of debugs. These warnings will only print on the first build run
by the daemon, which is, tbh, eh, shrug.
This is what led to us realizing that no-userns was a poorly exercised
condition.
Change-Id: I8e4f21afc89c574020dc7e89a560cc740ce6573a
This was found when `logrotate.conf` failed to build in a NixOS system
with:
/nix/store/26zdl4pyw5qazppj8if5lm8bjzxlc07l-coreutils-9.3/bin/id: cannot find name for group ID 30000
This was surprising because it seemed to mean that /etc/group was busted
in the sandbox. Indeed it was:
root❌0:
nixbld:!💯
nogroup❌65534:
We diagnosed this to sandboxUid() being called before
usingUserNamespace() was called, in setting up /etc/group inside the
sandbox. This code desperately needs refactoring.
We also moved the /etc/group code to be with the /etc/passwd code, but
honestly this code is all spaghetti'd all over the place and needs some
more serious tidying than we did here.
We also moved some checks to be earlier to improve locality with where
the things they are checking come from.
Change-Id: Ie29798771f3593c46ec313a32960fa955054aceb
This has the following downsides:
* you cannot build Lix against nixos-unstable.
* this will immediately break as soon as libseccomp will hit
nixos-23.11 (given that people will probably use the package.nix via
our overlay or override nixpkgs via `follows`).
Hence, removing the assert again and add a better FIXME comment.
Change-Id: I284e10cf08e1873fef70ed869a1638aa89792422
When I added the warning that an input X has an override for a
non-existent input, the recursive flake input override fix wasn't
implemented yet[1].
This patch tests that both work together.
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/6663
Change-Id: I90dc032029b7160ab4a97d28c480c59d3a6f0150
This reverts commit a8b3d777fb.
This undoes the revert of PR#6621, which allows nested `follows`, i.e.
{
inputs = {
foo.url = "github:bar/foo";
foo.inputs.bar.inputs.nixpkgs = "nixpkgs";
};
}
does the expected thing now. This is useful to avoid the 1000 instances
of nixpkgs problem without having each flake in the dependency tree to
expose all of its transitive dependencies for modification.
This was in fact part of Nix before and the C++ changes applied w/o
conflicts. However, it got reverted then because people didn't want to
merge lazy-trees against it which was supposed to be merged soon back in
October 2022.
Fixes: https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/201
Change-Id: I5ddef914135b695717b2ef88862d57ced5e7aa3c
With Linux kernel >=6.6 & glibc 2.39 a `fchmodat2(2)` is available that
isn't filtered away by the libseccomp sandbox.
Being able to use this to bypass that restriction has surprising results
for some builds such as lxc[1]:
> With kernel ≥6.6 and glibc 2.39, lxc's install phase uses fchmodat2,
> which slips through 9b88e52846/src/libstore/build/local-derivation-goal.cc (L1650-L1663).
> The fixupPhase then uses fchmodat, which fails.
> With older kernel or glibc, setting the suid bit fails in the
> install phase, which is not treated as fatal, and then the
> fixup phase does not try to set it again.
Please note that there are still ways to bypass this sandbox[2] and this is
mostly a fix for the breaking builds.
This change works by creating a syscall filter for the `fchmodat2`
syscall (number 452 on most systems). The problem is that glibc 2.39
is needed to have the correct syscall number available via
`__NR_fchmodat2` / `__SNR_fchmodat2`, but this flake is still on
nixpkgs 23.11. To have this change everywhere and not dependent on the
glibc this package is built against, I added a header
"fchmodat2-compat.hh" that sets the syscall number based on the
architecture. On most platforms its 452 according to glibc with a few
exceptions:
$ rg --pcre2 'define __NR_fchmodat2 (?!452)'
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/x32/arch-syscall.h
58:#define __NR_fchmodat2 1073742276
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n32/arch-syscall.h
67:#define __NR_fchmodat2 6452
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips64/n64/arch-syscall.h
62:#define __NR_fchmodat2 5452
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/mips/mips32/arch-syscall.h
70:#define __NR_fchmodat2 4452
sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/arch-syscall.h
59:#define __NR_fchmodat2 562
I added a small regression-test to the setuid integration-test that
attempts to set the suid bit on a file using the fchmodat2 syscall.
I confirmed that the test fails without the change in
local-derivation-goal.
Additionally, we require libseccomp 2.5.5 or greater now: as it turns
out, libseccomp maintains an internal syscall table and
validates each rule against it. This means that when using libseccomp
2.5.4 or older, one may pass `452` as syscall number against it, but
since it doesn't exist in the internal structure, `libseccomp` will refuse
to create a filter for that. This happens with nixpkgs-23.11, i.e. on
stable NixOS and when building Lix against the project's flake.
To work around that
* a backport of libseccomp 2.5.5 on upstream nixpkgs has been
scheduled[3].
* the package now uses libseccomp 2.5.5 on its own already. This is to
provide a quick fix since the correct fix for 23.11 is still a staging cycle
away.
We still need the compat header though since `SCMP_SYS(fchmodat2)`
internally transforms this into `__SNR_fchmodat2` which points to
`__NR_fchmodat2` from glibc 2.39, so it wouldn't build on glibc 2.38.
The updated syscall table from libseccomp 2.5.5 is NOT used for that
step, but used later, so we need both, our compat header and their
syscall table 🤷
Relevant PRs in CppNix:
* https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/10591
* https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/10501
[1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/300635#issuecomment-2031073804
[2] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/300635#issuecomment-2030844251
[3] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/306070
(cherry picked from commit ba6804518772e6afb403dd55478365d4b863c854)
Change-Id: I6921ab5a363188c6bff617750d00bb517276b7fe
Part of #7672
My main motivation is to be able to use `nix.checkConfig`[1]. This
doesn't work with Lix currently since the module uses `nix show-config`
if the Nix version is <2.20pre and `nix config show` otherwise. I think
this is the only instance where nixpkgs checks for which Nix commands
exist that affects us now, so I figured we could just perform the rename
here as well[2] and still provide the current version number[3].
I don't have a strong opinion on whether to deprecate `nix show-config`,
the warning is added there automatically.
(cherry picked from commit f300e11b056dea414d7d77bbc6e5a7dc5d9ddd41)
[1] https://nixos.org/manual/nixos/stable/options.html#opt-nix.checkConfig
[2] I should add that I don't use the "official" ways of installing Lix
because using the flake directly and callPackaging it seemed to fit
better into my workflow: I already have a little mess to make
sure Hydra from the flake uses the correct pkgs.nix and I didn't
want to complicate it further while keeping a single package-set I
can build in CI. Don't get me wrong, I think such a module for a
quick-start is very important, just giving context on why I bother
in the first place :)
[3] When we go public, I think it's worth considering to add support in
nixpkgs itself for Lix.
Change-Id: I47b4239b05cbeda3c370d2fa56ea768b768768ac
* changes:
docs: clarify how ^ works for -E/-f installables
docs: give translation examples from nix-build -E/-A to installables
docs: clarify how the different kinds of installables are selected
docs: guide to installables docs in installable commands' docs
Currently LocalDerivationGoal allows setting `__sandboxProfile`
to add sandbox parameters on Darwin when `sandbox=true`.
This was only supposed to have an effect when `sandbox=relaxed`
Change-Id: Ide44ee82d7e4d6b545285eab26547e7014817d3f
this is used in CA rewriting, replacement of placeholders in
derivations, generating scripts for devShells, and some more
places. in all of these transitive replacements are unsound,
and overlapping replacements would be as well. there even is
a test that transitive replacements do not happen (in the CA
RewriteSink suite), but none for overlapping replacements. a
minimally surprising binary rewriter surely would not do any
of these replacements, the only reason we have not seen this
break yet is probably that rewriteStrings is only called for
store paths and things that look like store paths (and those
should never overlap nor admit such transitive replacements)
Change-Id: I6fc29f939d5061d9f56c752624a823ece8437c07
* changes:
nix3-profile: remove check "name" attr in manifests
Add profile migration test
nix3-profile: make element names stable
getNameFromURL(): Support uppercase characters in attribute names
nix3-profile: remove indices
nix3-profile: allow using human-readable names to select packages
implement parsing human-readable names from URLs
It doesn't seem to have ever been used.
Based off of commit a748e88bf4cca0fdc6ce75188e88017a7899d16b
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/9656
Change-Id: Idcf250a645fa43f2ef11fb15b503b070a62a917e
Based off of commit 6268a45b650f563bae2360e0540920a2959bdd40
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/9656
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I0fcf069a8537c61ad6fc4eee1f3c193a708ea1c4
In particular, this makes it handle 'legacyPackages' correctly.
(cherry picked from commit 936a3642264ac159f3f9093710be3465b70e0e89)
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/9657
Change-Id: Icc4efe02f7f8e90a2970589f72fd3d3cd4418d95
Based off of commit 3187bc9ac3dd193b9329ef68c73ac3cca794ed78
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/9656
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I8ac4a33314cd1cf9de95404c20f58e883460acc7
These names are parsed from the URL provided for that package
Based off of commit 257b768436a0e8ab7887f9b790c5b92a7fe51ef5
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/8678
Co-authored-by: Felix Uhl <felix.uhl@outlook.com>
Change-Id: I76d5f9cfb11d3d2915b3dd1db21d7bb49e91f4fb
As discussed in the maintainer meeting on 2024-01-29.
Mainly this is to avoid a situation where the name is parsed and
treated as a file name, mostly to protect users.
.-* and ..-* are also considered invalid because they might strip
on that separator to remove versions. Doesn't really work, but that's
what we decided, and I won't argue with it, because .-* probably
doesn't seem to have a real world application anyway.
We do still permit a 1-character name that's just "-", which still
poses a similar risk in such a situation. We can't start disallowing
trailing -, because a non-zero number of users will need it and we've
seen how annoying and painful such a change is.
What matters most is preventing a situation where . or .. can be
injected, and to just get this done.
(cherry picked from commit f1b4663805a9dbcb1ace64ec110092d17c9155e0)
Change-Id: I900a8509933cee662f888c3c76fa8986b0058839
Gen::just is the constant generator. Don't just return that!
(cherry picked from commit 8406da28773f050e00a006e4812e3ecbf919a2a9)
Change-Id: Ibfd0bd40f90942077a4720086ce0cd3bfabef79d
Gen: :just is the constant generator. Don't just return that!
(cherry picked from commit 69bbd5852af9b2f0b794162bd1debcdf64fc6648)
Change-Id: Id6e58141f5a42a1f67bd11d48c87b32a3ebd0500
Based off of commit 257b768436a0e8ab7887f9b790c5b92a7fe51ef5
Upstream-PR: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/8678
Co-authored-by: Felix Uhl <felix.uhl@outlook.com>
Change-Id: Idcb7f6191ca3310ef9dc854197f7798260c3f71d
We didn't even realize you *could* use this syntax with -E and -f, much
less that the attribute path could be *empty*.
Change-Id: Id1a6715609f3a76a5ce477bd43a7832effbbe07b
The installables syntax is not documented in any of the man pages or
docbook pages for any of those individual commands. And while these
commands really should at least peripherally individually document how
installables work, in the meantime we can at least direct people to the
right place.
This commit also clarifies the unexpected fact that `nix profile remove`
and `nix profile upgrade` do *not* take installables.
Change-Id: I3b1453cb197a613bbab639c66a466365c3592c6d
This commit adds a new NixOS VM test, which tests that `nix upgrade-nix`
works on both kinds of profiles (manifest.nix and manifest.json).
Done as a separate commit from 831d18a13, since it relies on the
--store-path argument from 026c90e5f as well.
Change-Id: I5fc94b751d252862cb6cffb541a4c072faad9f3b
