96f1a404d0
Fix segfault on infinite recursion in some cases (cherry picked from commit bf1b294bd81ca76c5ec9fe3ecd52196bf52a8300) Change-Id: Id137541426ec8536567835953fccf986a3aebf16
36 lines
1 KiB
Nix
36 lines
1 KiB
Nix
# Check that stack frame deduplication only affects consecutive intervals, and
|
|
# that they are reported independently of any preceding sections, even if
|
|
# they're indistinguishable.
|
|
#
|
|
# In terms of the current implementation, we check that we clear the set of
|
|
# "seen frames" after eliding a group of frames.
|
|
#
|
|
# Suppose we have:
|
|
# - 10 frames in a function A
|
|
# - 10 frames in a function B
|
|
# - 10 frames in a function A
|
|
#
|
|
# We want to output:
|
|
# - a few frames of A (skip the rest)
|
|
# - a few frames of B (skip the rest)
|
|
# - a few frames of A (skip the rest)
|
|
#
|
|
# If we implemented this in the naive manner, we'd instead get:
|
|
# - a few frames of A (skip the rest)
|
|
# - a few frames of B (skip the rest, _and_ skip the remaining frames of A)
|
|
let
|
|
throwAfterB = recurse: n:
|
|
if n > 0
|
|
then throwAfterB recurse (n - 1)
|
|
else if recurse
|
|
then throwAfterA false 10
|
|
else throw "Uh oh!";
|
|
|
|
throwAfterA = recurse: n:
|
|
if n > 0
|
|
then throwAfterA recurse (n - 1)
|
|
else if recurse
|
|
then throwAfterB true 10
|
|
else throw "Uh oh!";
|
|
in
|
|
throwAfterA true 10
|