nixpkgs/doc/languages-frameworks/ruby.xml

<section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
         xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
         xml:id="sec-language-ruby">

<title>Ruby</title>

  <para>There currently is support to bundle applications that are packaged as Ruby gems. The utility "bundix" allows you to write a <filename>Gemfile</filename>, let bundler create a <filename>Gemfile.lock</filename>, and then convert
  this into a nix expression that contains all Gem dependencies automatically.</para>

  <para>For example, to package sensu, we did:</para>

<screen>
<![CDATA[$ cd pkgs/servers/monitoring
$ mkdir sensu
$ cd sensu
$ cat > Gemfile
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'sensu'
$ $(nix-build '<nixpkgs>' -A bundix)/bin/bundix --magic
$ cat > default.nix
{ lib, bundlerEnv, ruby }:

bundlerEnv rec {
  name = "sensu-${version}";

  version = (import gemset).sensu.version;
  inherit ruby;
  # expects Gemfile, Gemfile.lock and gemset.nix in the same directory
  gemdir = ./.;

  meta = with lib; {
    description = "A monitoring framework that aims to be simple, malleable, and scalable";
    homepage    = http://sensuapp.org/;
    license     = with licenses; mit;
    maintainers = with maintainers; [ theuni ];
    platforms   = platforms.unix;
  };
}]]>
</screen>

<para>Please check in the <filename>Gemfile</filename>, <filename>Gemfile.lock</filename> and the <filename>gemset.nix</filename> so future updates can be run easily.
</para>

<para>For tools written in Ruby - i.e. where the desire is to install a package and then execute e.g. <command>rake</command> at the command line, there is an alternative builder called <literal>bundlerApp</literal>. Set up the <filename>gemset.nix</filename> the same way, and then, for example:
</para>

<screen>
  <![CDATA[{ lib, bundlerApp }:

bundlerApp {
  pname = "corundum";
  gemdir = ./.;
  exes = [ "corundum-skel" ];

  meta = with lib; {
    description = "Tool and libraries for maintaining Ruby gems.";
    homepage    = https://github.com/nyarly/corundum;
    license     = licenses.mit;
    maintainers = [ maintainers.nyarly ];
    platforms   = platforms.unix;
  };
}]]>

<para>The chief advantage of <literal>bundlerApp</literal> over <literal>bundlerEnv</literal> is the executables introduced in the environment are precisely those selected in the <literal>exes</literal> list, as opposed to <literal>bundlerEnv</literal> which adds all the executables made available by gems in the gemset, which can mean e.g. <command>rspec</command> or <command>rake</command> in unpredictable versions available from various packages.

<para>Resulting derivations for both builders also have two helpful attributes, <literal>env</literal> and <literal>wrapper</literal>. The first one allows one to quickly drop into
<command>nix-shell</command> with the specified environment present. E.g. <command>nix-shell -A sensu.env</command> would give you an environment with Ruby preset
so it has all the libraries necessary for <literal>sensu</literal> in its paths. The second one can be used to make derivations from custom Ruby scripts which have
<filename>Gemfile</filename>s with their dependencies specified. It is a derivation with <command>ruby</command> wrapped so it can find all the needed dependencies.
For example, to make a derivation <literal>my-script</literal> for a <filename>my-script.rb</filename> (which should be placed in <filename>bin</filename>) you should
run <command>bundix</command> as specified above and then use <literal>bundlerEnv</literal> like this:</para>

<programlisting>
<![CDATA[let env = bundlerEnv {
  name = "my-script-env";

  inherit ruby;
  gemfile = ./Gemfile;
  lockfile = ./Gemfile.lock;
  gemset = ./gemset.nix;
};

in stdenv.mkDerivation {
  name = "my-script";

  buildInputs = [ env.wrapper ];

  script = ./my-script.rb;

  buildCommand = ''
    mkdir -p $out/bin
    install -D -m755 $script $out/bin/my-script
    patchShebangs $out/bin/my-script
  '';
}]]>
</programlisting>

</section>