In this document and related Nix expressions, we use the term, <emphasis>BEAM</emphasis>, to describe the environment. BEAM is the name of the Erlang Virtual Machine and, as far as we're concerned, from a packaging perspective, all languages that run on the BEAM are interchangeable. That which varies, like the build system, is transparent to users of any given BEAM package, so we make no distinction.
<literal>interpreters</literal>: a set of compilers running on the BEAM, including multiple Erlang/OTP versions (<literal>beam.interpreters.erlangR19</literal>, etc), Elixir (<literal>beam.interpreters.elixir</literal>) and LFE (<literal>beam.interpreters.lfe</literal>).
The default Erlang compiler, defined by <literal>beam.interpreters.erlang</literal>, is aliased as <literal>erlang</literal>. The default BEAM package set is defined by <literal>beam.packages.erlang</literal> and aliased at the top level as <literal>beamPackages</literal>.
To create a package set built with a custom Erlang version, use the lambda, <literal>beam.packagesWith</literal>, which accepts an Erlang/OTP derivation and produces a package set similar to <literal>beam.packages.erlang</literal>.
Many Erlang/OTP distributions available in <literal>beam.interpreters</literal> have versions with ODBC and/or Java enabled. For example, there's <literal>beam.interpreters.erlangR19_odbc_javac</literal>, which corresponds to <literal>beam.interpreters.erlangR19</literal>.
We also provide the lambda, <literal>beam.packages.erlang.callPackage</literal>, which simplifies writing BEAM package definitions by injecting all packages from <literal>beam.packages.erlang</literal> into the top-level context.
We provide a version of Rebar3, which is the normal, unmodified Rebar3, under <literal>rebar3</literal>. We also provide a helper to fetch Rebar3 dependencies from a lockfile under <literal>fetchRebar3Deps</literal>.
Both Mix and Erlang.mk work exactly as expected. There is a bootstrap process that needs to be run for both, however, which is supported by the <literal>buildMix</literal> and <literal>buildErlangMk</literal> derivations, respectively.
BEAM packages are not registered at the top level, simply because they are not relevant to the vast majority of Nix users. They are installable using the <literal>beam.packages.erlang</literal> attribute set (aliased as <literal>beamPackages</literal>), which points to packages built by the default Erlang/OTP version in Nixpkgs, as defined by <literal>beam.interpreters.erlang</literal>. To list the available packages in <literal>beamPackages</literal>, use the following command:
The attribute path of any BEAM package corresponds to the name of that particular package in <linkxlink:href="https://hex.pm">Hex</link> or its OTP Application/Release name.
The Nix function, <literal>buildRebar3</literal>, defined in <literal>beam.packages.erlang.buildRebar3</literal> and aliased at the top level, can be used to build a derivation that understands how to build a Rebar3 project. For example, we can build <link
xlink:href="https://github.com/erlang-nix/hex2nix">hex2nix</link> as follows:
Such derivations are callable with <literal>beam.packages.erlang.callPackage</literal> (see <xref
linkend="erlang-call-package"/>). To call this package using the normal <literal>callPackage</literal>, refer to dependency packages via <literal>beamPackages</literal>, e.g. <literal>beamPackages.ibrowse</literal>.
Notably, <literal>buildRebar3</literal> includes <literal>beamDeps</literal>, while <literal>stdenv.mkDerivation</literal> does not. BEAM dependencies added there will be correctly handled by the system.
Often, we simply want to access a valid environment that contains a specific package and its dependencies. We can accomplish that with the <literal>env</literal> attribute of a derivation. For example, let's say we want to access an Erlang REPL with <literal>ibrowse</literal> loaded up. We could do the following:
Getting access to an environment often isn't enough to do real development. Usually, we need to create a <literal>shell.nix</literal> file and do our development inside of the environment specified therein. This file looks a lot like the packaging described above, except that <literal>src</literal> points to the project root and we call the package directly.
Using a <literal>shell.nix</literal> as described (see <xref
linkend="creating-a-shell"/>) should just work. Aside from <literal>test</literal>, <literal>plt</literal>, and <literal>analyze</literal>, the Make targets work just fine for all of the build derivations.
Updating the <linkxlink:href="https://hex.pm">Hex</link> package set requires <link
xlink:href="https://github.com/erlang-nix/hex2nix">hex2nix</link>. Given the path to the Erlang modules (usually <literal>pkgs/development/erlang-modules</literal>), it will dump a file called <literal>hex-packages.nix</literal>, containing all the packages that use a recognized build system in <link
xlink:href="https://hex.pm">Hex</link>. It can't be determined, however, whether every package is buildable.
To make life easier for our users, try to build every <link
xlink:href="https://hex.pm">Hex</link> package and remove those that fail. To do that, simply run the following command in the root of your <literal>nixpkgs</literal> repository:
That will attempt to build every package in <literal>beamPackages</literal>. Then manually remove those that fail. Hopefully, someone will improve <link
xlink:href="https://github.com/erlang-nix/hex2nix">hex2nix</link> in the future to automate the process.