2013-05-07 22:56:22 +02:00
|
|
|
{ stdenv, buildPythonPackage, fetchurl, coreutils, twisted }:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buildPythonPackage (rec {
|
2014-04-13 21:11:49 +02:00
|
|
|
name = "buildbot-slave-0.8.8";
|
2013-05-07 22:56:22 +02:00
|
|
|
namePrefix = "";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
src = fetchurl {
|
|
|
|
url = "http://buildbot.googlecode.com/files/${name}.tar.gz";
|
2014-04-13 21:11:49 +02:00
|
|
|
sha256 = "1k1pk3y0rk6j01wc491jblryr4ajqg1ing9m3sjaw9s5sga34xcb";
|
2013-05-07 22:56:22 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
patchPhase = ''
|
|
|
|
substituteInPlace buildslave/scripts/logwatcher.py --replace /usr/bin/tail ${coreutils}/bin/tail
|
|
|
|
'';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
propagatedBuildInputs = [ twisted ];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# What's up with this?! 'trial' should be 'test', no?
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# running tests
|
|
|
|
# usage: setup.py [global_opts] cmd1 [cmd1_opts] [cmd2 [cmd2_opts] ...]
|
|
|
|
# or: setup.py --help [cmd1 cmd2 ...]
|
|
|
|
# or: setup.py --help-commands
|
|
|
|
# or: setup.py cmd --help
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# error: invalid command 'trial'
|
|
|
|
doCheck = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
postInstall = ''
|
|
|
|
mkdir -p "$out/share/man/man1"
|
|
|
|
cp docs/buildslave.1 "$out/share/man/man1"
|
|
|
|
'';
|
|
|
|
|
2013-05-20 19:33:18 +02:00
|
|
|
meta = with stdenv.lib; {
|
2013-05-07 22:56:22 +02:00
|
|
|
homepage = http://buildbot.net/;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
license = "GPLv2+";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
description = "Continuous integration system that automates the build/test cycle";
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
longDescription =
|
|
|
|
'' The BuildBot is a system to automate the compile/test cycle
|
|
|
|
required by most software projects to validate code changes. By
|
|
|
|
automatically rebuilding and testing the tree each time something
|
|
|
|
has changed, build problems are pinpointed quickly, before other
|
|
|
|
developers are inconvenienced by the failure. The guilty
|
|
|
|
developer can be identified and harassed without human
|
|
|
|
intervention. By running the builds on a variety of platforms,
|
|
|
|
developers who do not have the facilities to test their changes
|
|
|
|
everywhere before checkin will at least know shortly afterwards
|
|
|
|
whether they have broken the build or not. Warning counts, lint
|
|
|
|
checks, image size, compile time, and other build parameters can
|
|
|
|
be tracked over time, are more visible, and are therefore easier
|
|
|
|
to improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall goal is to reduce tree breakage and provide a platform
|
|
|
|
to run tests or code-quality checks that are too annoying or
|
|
|
|
pedantic for any human to waste their time with. Developers get
|
|
|
|
immediate (and potentially public) feedback about their changes,
|
|
|
|
encouraging them to be more careful about testing before checking
|
|
|
|
in code.
|
|
|
|
'';
|
2013-05-20 19:33:18 +02:00
|
|
|
maintainers = with maintainers; [ bjornfor ];
|
|
|
|
platforms = platforms.all;
|
2013-05-07 22:56:22 +02:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
})
|