VM tests are expensive (and prone to random failures) so they should
only be used for things that can only be tested in a VM, not for
things that could be tested in a regular checkPhase or derivation.
4255954d97 set the StateDirectory to 0750,
but nginx wasn't in the Mastodon group. This commit also deletes a line,
that probably was intended to serve this purpose, but makes no sense.
Why should the Mastodon user be added as an extraGroup to the nginx
user?
Ensure that the HyperV keyboard driver is available in the early
stages of the boot process. This allows the user to enter a disk
encryption passphrase or repair a boot problem in an interactive
shell.
The `--apis=` command line parameter passed to Jitsi Videobridge is
required to monitor a Jitsi Meet instance for example via the prometheus
exporter [jitsiexporter](https://git.xsfx.dev/prometheus/jitsiexporter).
@thelegy writes:
unitOption is only used inside of attrsOf wich is perfectly capable of
handling the attrsets from mkIf, though the checkUnitConfig test
forbids it.
This commit weakens that restriction to allow the usage of mkIf inside
of systemd.services.<name>.serviceConfig.<something> etc.
While I personally don't like that we can't easily use
pushDownProperties from the module system and need to rely on internals,
we *already* use internals for the mkOverride case, so adding another
case for mkIf doesn't add a hard-to-find indirection.
I'm merging this, since this fixes a valid use case and it shouldn't
make refactoring worse than before.
The NixOS 21.03 release has been delayed to 21.05. See NixOS/rfcs#80.
There are two instances of 21.03 which have been left as is, since they
are in stateVersion comparisons. This will ensure that existing user
configurations which refer to 21.03 will continue to work.
`unitOption` is only used inside of `attrsOf` wich is perfectly capable of
handling the attrsets from `mkIf`, though the checkUnitConfig test
forbids it. This commit weakens that restriction to allow the usage of
`mkIf` inside of `systemd.services.<name>.serviceConfig.<something>`
etc.
Account for the fact that, when creating a lua package without the
"withPackages" helper, we dont get an extra "lua" attribute in the
package.
Therefore we need to distinguish between the "withPackages" case and the
direct ( or "empty" ) lua package.
For example with this nixos config:
```nix
{
services.httpd = {
enable = true;
package = pkgs.apacheHttpd.override {
luaSupport = true;
lua5 = pkgs.lua5_3.withPackages (ps: with ps; [ luafilesystem ] );
};
};
}
```
Here we say that we want to have apache to use a lua, packaged with the
`luafilesystem` module so that we can `require` that in scripts to
render http responses. There, the set that gets assigned to `lua5 ` does
not have a `luaversion` attribute, rather it has a `lua` attribute
wherein lies a `luaversion` attribute. If we dont package additional
modules, then we dont have that `lua` attribute in between and rather
directly have to use `luaversion` directly.
