We're now using .pki.server.* and .pki.ca.* so that it's entirely clear
what these keys/certificates are for. For example we had just .pki.key
before, which doesn't really tell very much about what it's for except
if you look at the option description.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
The improvement here is just that we're adding a big <note/> here so
that users of these options are aware that whenever they're setting one
of these the certificates and keys are _not_ created automatically.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
This is clearly a server configuration option and has nothing to do with
certificate creation and signing, so let's move it away from the .pki
namespace.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
It's not necessarily related to the PKI options, because this is also
used for setting the server address on the Taskwarrior client.
So if someone doesn't have his/her own certificates from another CA, all
options that need to be adjusted are in .pki. And if someone doesn't
want to bother with getting certificates from another CA, (s)he just
doesn't set anything in .pki.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
After moving out the PKI-unrelated options, let's name this a bit more
appropriate, so we can finally get rid of the taskserver.server thing.
This also moves taskserver.caCert to taskserver.pki.caCert, because that
clearly belongs to the PKI options.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Having an option called services.taskserver.server.host is quite
confusing because we already have "server" in the service name, so let's
first get rid of the listening options before we rename the rest of the
options in that .server attribute.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
As the nixos-taskserver command can also be used to imperatively manage
users, we need to test this as well.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
In the comments of the pull request @nbp wrote:
"Why is it implemented in 3 different languages: Nix, Bash and C?"
And he's right, it doesn't make sense, because we were using C as a
runuser replacement and used Nix to generate the shellscript
boilerplates.
Writing this in Python gets rid of all of this and we also don't need
the boilerplate as well, because we're using Click to handle all the
command line stuff.
Note that this currently is a 1:1 implementation of what we had before.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
fixes#13507
On June 8 (e8655ee) tortoisehg changed the way
it computes the `/usr/share` directory in a way that
invalidated the assumptions behind the use
of substituteInPlace in postUnpack.
I think the intention of this functionality was to provide a simple
alternative to the "runAsRoot" and "contents" attributes.
The implementation caused very slow builds of Docker images. Almost all
of the build time was spent in IO for tar, due to tarballs being
created, immediately extracted, then recreated. I had 30 minute builds
on some of my images which are now down to less than 2 minutes. A couple
of other users on #nix IRC have observed similar improvements.
The implementation also mutated the produced Docker layers without
changing their hashes. Using non-empty tarballs would produce images
which got cached incorrectly in Docker.
I have a commit which just fixes the performance problem but I opted to
completely remove the tarball feature after I found out that it didn't
correctly implement the Docker Image Specification due to the broken
hashing.
The option is solely for debugging purposes (particularly the unit tests
of the project itself) and doesn't make sense to include it in the NixOS
module options.
If people want to use this, we might want to introduce another option so
that we can insert arbitrary configuration lines.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
By setting `-DDISABLE_ADVANCE_SIMD=TRUE` pcsx2 will be compiled with predefined
SIMD flags instead of `-march=native`. This makes the resulting binary more
portable. Further this seems to be needed to make pcsx2 compile with gcc5.
There is no licenses.bsd. Consulting the source reveals that it
uses the language of the ISC license (which is supposed to be equivalent to
the simplified BSD license).
Commit 98d9bba introduced this option as a nullOr type and it actually
checks whether null has been set and only appends -dpi if that's the
case. So let's actually set the default to null instead of 0.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Works around failure with gcc5, see
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/34273319/nixlog/1/raw
Not a real fix, but a working build is better than nothing ...
I have tested that the program at least runs: it fails to load a few
plugins, tho, have no idea to what extent that affects use
Couldn't load plugin 'ricevideo.so':
/nix/store/...-mupen64plus-1.5/share/mupen64plus/plugins/ricevideo.so:
undefined symbol: glCombinerInputNV
Couldn't load plugin 'glN64.so':
/nix/store/...-mupen64plus-1.5/share/mupen64plus/plugins/glN64.so:
undefined symbol: glCombinerInputNV
This module adds an option `security.hideProcessInformation` that, when
enabled, restricts access to process information such as command-line
arguments to the process owner. The module adds a static group "proc"
whose members are exempt from process information hiding.
Ideally, this feature would be implemented by simply adding the
appropriate mount options to `fileSystems."/proc".fsOptions`, but this
was found to not work in vmtests. To ensure that process information
hiding is enforced, we use a systemd service unit that remounts `/proc`
after `systemd-remount-fs.service` has completed.
To verify the correctness of the feature, simple tests were added to
nixos/tests/misc: the test ensures that unprivileged users cannot see
process information owned by another user, while members of "proc" CAN.
Thanks to @abbradar for feedback and suggestions.
