The test only checked for existence of the rule file in the output path
of the rulefile generator.
However, we also need to check whether the basename of the file is also
the one we're currently searching for.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Partially reverts the following commits:
9f2a61c59c9c13fe6604
As @edolstra pointed out, it would make more sense to do this by default
instead of having that allowImpurePaths option. This of course might
break systems which add extra packages to udev, but on the upside it's
hard to miss one of these paths now because it won't get buried in the
ocean of build output lines.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
So far we were merely printing a warning if there are still references
to (/usr)/s?bin, but we actually want to make sure that we fix those
paths, especially on updates of packages that come with udev rules.
This adds a new option allowImpurePaths, which when set to false will
cause the "udev-rules" derivation to fail.
I've set this to true by default, to not break existing systems too much
and the intention is to set it to false for a few NixOS VM tests.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
We were trying to find FHS references in all of the rules found in
services.udev.packages. Unfortunately we're still fixing up paths in the
same derivation where we are checking those references, so for example
references to /sbin/modprobe were still printed to be needed to fixup
even though they were already fixed at the time.
So now we're printing a more helpful warning message which is also
conditional (before the warning message was printed regardless of
whether there are any rules that need fixup) and is based off the rules
that were already fixed up.
The new warning message not only contains the build-local rule files but
also the original files from other store paths and the FHS path
references that were still found.
With 8ecd3a5e1d reverted, we now get this:
/nix/store/...-udev-rules/63-md-raid-arrays.rules (originally from
/nix/store/...-mdadm-3.3.4/lib/udev/rules.d/63-md-raid-arrays.rules)
contains references to /usr/bin/readlink and /usr/bin/basename.
Which is now more accurate to what is not yet fixed and where it's
coming from.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
In 8ecd3a5, we fixed up the FHS paths for stage 1, but unfortunately we
have a similar udev rules generator twice one for the initrd and one
without. So we might need to refactor this in the future.
For now, let's just fix the references to readlink and basename in the
udev module as well until we have properly addressed this.
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Fixes: #12722
Regression introduced by 5184aaa1ea.
The fix was intended to remove the "x == true/false" assertions, but by
accident a "x == false" was made "x == true" instead of "(!x)".
Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
Reported-by: devhell <"^"@regexmail.net>
