When overriding gnupg to uss pinentry gnome3 frontend, there is
a dependency cycle:
gnupg → pinentry_gnome → gcr → gnupg
This commit overrides the gnupg required by gcr to not build GUI.
The pinentry_gnome package requires gcr. Unfortunately, when configure
asks about the library (or `pkg-config --libs gcr-base-3` is used) it
fails because glib is not in scope.
```
$ pkg-config --libs gcr-base-3
Package glib-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `glib-2.0.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'glib-2.0', required by 'gcr-base-3', not found
```
This commit moves glib and gtk to `propagatedBuildInputs` so pkgconfig
could find them.
See also 38b58bab62
* gnome3: only maintain single GNOME 3 package set
GNOME 3 was split into 3.10 and 3.12 in #2694. Unfortunately, we barely have the resources
to update a single version of GNOME. Maintaining multiple versions just does not make sense.
Additionally, it makes viewing history using most Git tools bothersome.
This commit renames `pkgs/desktops/gnome-3/3.24` to `pkgs/desktops/gnome-3`, removes
the config variable for choosing packageset (`environment.gnome3.packageSet`), updates
the hint in maintainer script, and removes the `gnome3_24` derivation from `all-packages.nix`.
Closes: #29329
* maintainers/scripts/gnome: Use fixed GNOME 3 directory
Since we now allow only a single GNOME 3 package set, specifying
the working directory is not necessary.
This commit sets the directory to `pkgs/desktops/gnome-3`.
10k staging builds are not yet finished on Hydra (mostly darwin),
but we now have a 20k jobs rebuilding directly on master, so we would
never get to merge this way...
This reverts commit 0a944b345e, reversing
changes made to 61733ed6cc.
I dislike these massive stdenv changes with unclear motivation,
especially when they involve gratuitous mass renames like NIX_CC ->
NIX_BINUTILS. The previous such rename (NIX_GCC -> NIX_CC) caused
months of pain, so let's not do that again.
The main thing is that I'm convinced the license can't be free when it
restricts redistribution to certain platforms. That probably holds with
the usual definitions like from Debian, FSF or OSI.
