cafkafk/nixpkgs
cafkafk/nixpkgs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2
309200 commits 1 branch 0 tags 3.7 GiB
Commit graph

38 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kid
af74d97e9b
doc: fix typo and wording in pull request template 2021-08-05 22:45:09 +08:00
Niklas Hambüchen
3c29ced243 CONTRIBUTING.md: Move to repo root, where it is more visible. 
We found that many users found it difficult to locate this document.

Github supports it in the root, see:
https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors
 2021-06-26 04:51:38 +02:00
Ryan Mulligan
f91d7910ea doc: cleanup documentation relating to release notes 
Also delete empty release notes file.
 2021-06-23 11:04:22 -07:00
Pavol Rusnak
576c2f555e pull_request_template: fix link to CONTRIBUTING.md 2021-06-05 08:27:10 -07:00
Jonathan Ringer
291dcac830
pull_request_template: Add release note criteria 2021-06-02 13:37:14 -07:00
Léo Gaspard
211fee9c43
pull request template: cleanup (#117537) 
Remove elements of the PR template that have a low signal/noise ratio,
and add one that I think would have a good signal/noise ratio.

-----
Remove:
Determined the impact on package closure size (by running `nix path-info
-S` before and after)
-----
Rationale:
This is rarely done in practice, and apart from for specific packages
this is usually not a good indicator of anything useful

It might make sense to re-introduce it with two holes to fill, but then
we would have to make a serious decision to never land without these two
numbers filled in or with too big a regression, because in practice this
box has been a no-op in many cases.

Maybe just integrating this check in nixpkgs-review would bring the most
benefit here?
-----

-----
Remove:
Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
-----
Rationale:
This is fuzzy, “relevant documentation” is way too often hard to find
-----

-----
Add:
Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
-----
Rationale:
This is way too often forgotten, and is also a self-contained easy task
-----
 2021-05-21 03:06:21 +02:00
Jonathan Ringer
698c471340
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: use rendered docs 2020-11-13 16:18:19 -08:00
Pavol Rusnak
7b0167204d treewide: use https for nixos.org and hydra.nixos.org 
tarballs.nixos.org is omitted from the change because urls from there
are always hashed and checked
 2020-05-03 22:14:21 -07:00
Jörg Thalheim
93862d05f7
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: try to simplify call-for-review 
The text is quite long and hard to read in hub (because it is one whole line
with no line breaks). Also simplified the language/sentence structure a bit for
non-native speakers.
 2020-04-27 22:07:19 +01:00
Ingolf Wagner
d9bbc22cef
.github: remove cc from pull-request template 2020-01-03 15:58:31 +13:00
Jörg Thalheim
8a57552c18
nixpkgs-review: 2.1.0 -> 2.1.1 
changelog: https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review/releases/tag/2.1.1
 2019-12-22 09:26:57 +00:00
Americo
5c59da48e4
.github: clarify things done re: sandboxing 
Per https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/58147#issuecomment-478234495
sandboxing is not fully functional on macOS.

.github: specify where sandboxing can be run

Co-Authored-By: Jon <jonringer@users.noreply.github.com>

.github: remove macOS note
 2019-10-30 11:32:29 -07:00
Vladimír Čunát
3c5f5b1cde Fix link in PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (the same link) 2019-10-28 19:25:05 +01:00
Steven Shaw
e2a28e8dd2 PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add "Notify maintainers" section 2019-07-30 08:36:16 +02:00
Craig Hall
d096030d07
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: "Assured whether" -> "Ensured that" 2019-07-01 11:22:48 +01:00
worldofpeace
1d38a2f5c3
Merge pull request #58098 from Infinisil/encouraging_reviews 
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add encouragement to review PRs
 2019-04-04 17:14:18 -04:00
Silvan Mosberger
4e398a325e
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Add encouragement to review PRs 2019-03-28 21:18:46 +01:00
Jörg Thalheim
22d083e659
doc/reviewing-contributions: nix-review instead of nox-review 
It is faster, handles more edge cases and allows to test/review the built
packages interactively.
 2019-03-20 11:28:00 +00:00
Niklas Hambüchen
f2816e47ab PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: Ask for docs 2018-11-22 19:57:19 +01:00
Eelco Dolstra
bf1c28e978
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: Ask for closure size impact 2018-06-21 18:52:26 +02:00
Bob van der Linden
b503e76ee0
use sandbox instead of build-use-sandbox 2018-05-30 21:48:07 +02:00
Maxime Dénès
9ca1b56683
pr template: make values of platform field less ambiguous 2017-10-09 12:53:09 +02:00
Piotr Bogdan
e221d945ad pr template: make formatting consistent 2017-09-03 19:57:18 +01:00
Linus Heckemann
02d168e130 Pull request template: comment out instructions 2017-08-12 15:17:39 +01:00
Yegor Timoshenko
72239c3a22 PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: mereley -> merely 2017-07-28 23:38:25 +00:00
Frederik Rietdijk
138eba0bff Pull request template: clarify the purpose of the template 2017-07-22 18:05:16 +02:00
aszlig
fa6fd34fcc
github/pr-template: Add note about NixOS tests 
On several occasions I've seen people bumping packages which have NixOS
tests but without actually running them.

While this probably won't prevent such occasions entirely, at least it
serves as an additional checklist item so contributors don't forget
about these tests.

Signed-off-by: aszlig <aszlig@redmoonstudios.org>
 2017-06-23 05:33:06 +02:00
Ignat Loskutov
d91eba4ec3 Update PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md 
Follow the rebranding of OS X into macOS
 2016-11-04 18:49:40 +03:00
Rushmore Mushambi
0192777972 PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: rename chroot to sandbox 
See b39622a487
 2016-09-02 21:41:43 +02:00
Vladimír Čunát
156105c489 PR template: go back to old option name for now 
The old one works on all nix(os) versions, whereas the new one doesn't
work e.g. on default 16.03 setting. Discussed on #15112.
 2016-06-29 21:44:05 +02:00
Daniel Peebles
0bd54a6d5d Update PR template with motivation for changes 
I'm seeing a lot of PRs that only include the checklist, when the main thing I care about when I'm reviewing a PR is what the author was thinking when they decided to make the change.
 2016-05-24 07:59:46 -04:00
Vladimír Čunát
4c10d404e7 github PR template: reformulate the sandboxing help 
It's been reported that when running through nix daemon,
sandboxing can't be turned on by passing `--option` (silently ignored),
so let's not suggest that way.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/14866#issuecomment-214619909
 2016-04-26 09:18:15 +02:00
Vladimír Čunát
7cf8daa2bb nixos: rename chroot* to sandbox* 
On Nix side this was done months ago:
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/682
 2016-04-25 11:04:08 +02:00
zimbatm
8706726d59 Simplify contributing 
* Highlight the top mistakes directly in CONTRIBUTING.md
* Remove unecessary cruft from the PR template
 2016-04-09 17:59:35 +01:00
Nathan Zadoks
d0b8080062 .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: use individual checkboxes for tested OSes 2016-03-16 09:46:05 +01:00
Domen Kožar
2af46e4393 PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: fix issues raised in 3c84ae406 2016-02-28 09:26:28 +00:00
Domen Kožar
3c84ae406d PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md: clarify a few things 2016-02-28 08:50:33 +00:00
Arseniy Seroka
ac9ab2c3f5 PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE: init 2016-02-22 13:45:56 +03:00