117a1a6a2c
Instead of only testing the runner registration, which doesn't tell us all that much, we now test a (very simple) but actual workflow directly runner on the host (type `:host`). For this to work, we cache the official `actions/checkout` action from GitHub as FOD and essentially mirror one version of it to Forgejo as part of the test. Since Forgejo does not yet provide an API endpoint for the workflow status (whether a workflow is running, failed or successful), we have to resort to parsing html for now. It has some rather over the top poll logic, but I feel like will work for quite some time without issues going unnoticed or whatever (TM). This is essentially a response to a bug I found in `services.gitea-actions-runner`, because we had no way to test that module besides the runner registration (which, again, doesn't really tell us all that much). |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
doc/manual | ||
lib | ||
maintainers | ||
modules | ||
tests | ||
COPYING | ||
default.nix | ||
README.md | ||
release-combined.nix | ||
release-small.nix | ||
release.nix |
NixOS
NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.
Testing changes
You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually it’s /etc/nixos/configuration.nix
). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast
.
Commit conventions
-
Make sure you read about the commit conventions common to Nixpkgs as a whole.
-
Format the commit messages in the following way:
nixos/(module): (init module | add setting | refactor | etc) (Motivation for change. Link to release notes. Additional information.)
Examples:
-
nixos/hydra: add bazBaz option
Dual baz behavior is needed to do foo.
-
nixos/nginx: refactor config generation
The old config generation system used impure shell scripts and could break in specific circumstances (see #1234).
-
Reviewing contributions
When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break people’s installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.
Module updates
Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
- CODEOWNERS will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- You may invoke OfBorg with
@ofborg test <module>
to buildnixosTests.<module>
- You may invoke OfBorg with
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOf
andstring
types are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
mkRenamedOptionModuleWith
provides a way to make renamed option backward compatible.- Use
lib.versionAtLeast config.system.stateVersion "23.11"
on backward incompatible changes which may corrupt, change or update the state stored on existing setups.
- Ensure that removed options are declared with
mkRemovedOptionModule
. - Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
- Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.
Sample template for a module update review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments
New modules
New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that all file paths fit the guidelines.
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOf
andstring
types are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that module
meta
field is present- Maintainers should be declared in
meta.maintainers
. - Module documentation should be declared with
meta.doc
.
- Maintainers should be declared in
- Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
- For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.
Sample template for a new module review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to `environment.systemPackages`
- [ ] `meta.maintainers` is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in `meta.doc`
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments