The binutils build system checks by itself if it is building a cross
toolchain or not and prepends or omits a targetPrefix accordingly. This
means that we can always pass target via configureTargets.
However the binutils build system and our bintools wrapper disagree over
whether we are building a cross toolchain or not sometimes since cross
compilation can be relatively subtle in nixpkgs. For example every use
of crossOverlays will make nixpkgs build a cross toolchain even though
localSystem == crossSystem. The cross infrastructure is also used to
build native binaries with a different stdenv (musl instead of glibc,
clang instead of gcc). In all of these cases stdenv.hostPlatform.config
== stdenv.targetPlatform.config, causing binutils to not prepend a
target prefix. At the same time stdenv.hostPlatform !=
stdenv.targetPlatform causing the bintools wrapper to expect a target
prefix, thus building an incomplete set of bintools. This is why
currently pkgsCross.gnu64 and pkgsCross.musl64 aren't working.
The solution is quite simple however: If we detect that we are building
a cross toolchain in the binutils-unwrapped expression, we force the
targetPrefix with --programprefix and fulfill the expectations of the
bintools wrapper at the same time.
Tested (on x86_64-linux):
* pkgsCross.musl64.hello
* pkgsCross.aarch64-multiplatform.hello
* pkgs.hello
Still not working is pkgsCross.gnu64, since
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-stage-final-gcc gets confused about targets
now, so bootstrapping the stdenv fails. Since this wasn't working
previously anyways, it's proably fine to fix this separately.
ca9be0511b