67cc78643d
A more efficient sort in some cases, and often convenient. This exposes `lib.lists.sortOn` immediately on `lib`, because it is a sibling of `sort`, which is already present there. Omitting it would lead to more confusion, and worse outcomes. There's no confusion about the types `sort` or `sortOn` operate on. Haskell agrees about the type for `sortOn`, and it is in its `base`. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| modules | ||
| check-eval.nix | ||
| filesystem.sh | ||
| maintainer-module.nix | ||
| maintainers.nix | ||
| misc.nix | ||
| modules.sh | ||
| nix-for-tests.nix | ||
| release.nix | ||
| sources.sh | ||
| systems.nix | ||
| teams.nix | ||
| test-to-plist-expected.plist | ||