troldspejlet/forgejo
troldspejlet/forgejo
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git synced 2024-11-10 12:49:52 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 5

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments

Browse source 
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2109
(cherry picked from commit 8b4ba3dce7)
(cherry picked from commit 196edea0f9)

[GITEA] POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments (squash) do not implicitly create a review

If a comment already exists in a review, the comment is added. If it
is the first comment added to a review, it will implicitly create a
new review instead of adding to the existing one.

The pull_service.CreateCodeComment function is responsibe for this
behavior and it will defer to createCodeComment once the review is
determined, either because it was found or because it was created.

Rename createCodeComment into CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID to expose
it and change the API endpoint to use it instead. Since the review is
provided by the user and verified to exist already, there is no need
for the logic implemented by CreateCodeComment.

The tests are modified to remove the initial comment from the fixture
because it was creating the false positive. I was verified to fail
without this fix.

(cherry picked from commit 6a555996dc)
(cherry picked from commit b173a0ccee)
(cherry picked from commit 838ab9740a)
This commit is contained in:
Earl Warren 2024-01-09 12:49:18 +01:00
parent 91b5aa0e5f
commit 603a44edf0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 0579CB2928A78A00
8 changed files with 274 additions and 24 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
modules/structs/pull_review.go
View file

@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ type CreatePullReviewComment struct {
NewLineNum int64 `json:"new_position"`
}
// CreatePullReviewCommentOptions are options to create a pull review comment
type CreatePullReviewCommentOptions CreatePullReviewComment
// SubmitPullReviewOptions are options to submit a pending pull review
type SubmitPullReviewOptions struct {
Event ReviewStateType `json:"event"`

3
routers/api/v1/api.go
View file

@ -1228,7 +1228,8 @@ func Routes() *web.Route {
Delete(reqToken(), repo.DeletePullReview).
Post(reqToken(), bind(api.SubmitPullReviewOptions{}), repo.SubmitPullReview)
m.Combo("/comments").
Get(repo.GetPullReviewComments)
Get(repo.GetPullReviewComments).
Post(reqToken(), bind(api.CreatePullReviewCommentOptions{}), repo.CreatePullReviewComment)
m.Post("/dismissals", reqToken(), bind(api.DismissPullReviewOptions{}), repo.DismissPullReview)
m.Post("/undismissals", reqToken(), repo.UnDismissPullReview)
})

83
routers/api/v1/repo/pull_review.go
View file

@ -208,6 +208,89 @@ func GetPullReviewComments(ctx *context.APIContext) {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusOK, apiComments)
}
// CreatePullReviewComments add a new comment to a pull request review
func CreatePullReviewComment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/comments repository repoCreatePullReviewComment
// ---
// summary: Add a new comment to a pull request review
// produces:
// - application/json
// parameters:
// - name: owner
// in: path
// description: owner of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: repo
// in: path
// description: name of the repo
// type: string
// required: true
// - name: index
// in: path
// description: index of the pull request
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: id
// in: path
// description: id of the review
// type: integer
// format: int64
// required: true
// - name: body
// in: body
// required: true
// schema:
// "$ref": "#/definitions/CreatePullReviewCommentOptions"
// responses:
// "200":
// "$ref": "#/responses/PullReviewComment"
// "404":
// "$ref": "#/responses/notFound"
// "422":
// "$ref": "#/responses/validationError"
opts := web.GetForm(ctx).(*api.CreatePullReviewCommentOptions)
review, pr, statusSet := prepareSingleReview(ctx)
if statusSet {
return
}
if err := pr.Issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
ctx.InternalServerError(err)
return
}
line := opts.NewLineNum
if opts.OldLineNum > 0 {
line = opts.OldLineNum * -1
}
comment, err := pull_service.CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
ctx.Doer,
pr.Issue.Repo,
pr.Issue,
opts.Body,
opts.Path,
line,
review.ID,
)
if err != nil {
ctx.InternalServerError(err)
return
}
apiComment, err := convert.ToPullReviewComment(ctx, review, comment, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
ctx.InternalServerError(err)
return
}
ctx.JSON(http.StatusOK, apiComment)
}
// DeletePullReview delete a specific review from a pull request
func DeletePullReview(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// swagger:operation DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id} repository repoDeletePullReview

3
routers/api/v1/swagger/options.go
View file

@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ type swaggerParameterBodies struct {
// in:body
CreatePullReviewComment api.CreatePullReviewComment
// in:body
CreatePullReviewCommentOptions api.CreatePullReviewCommentOptions
// in:body
SubmitPullReviewOptions api.SubmitPullReviewOptions

50
services/convert/pull_review.go
View file

@ -78,6 +78,33 @@ func ToPullReviewList(ctx context.Context, rl []*issues_model.Review, doer *user
return result, nil
}
// ToPullReviewCommentList convert the CodeComments of an review to it's api format
func ToPullReviewComment(ctx context.Context, review *issues_model.Review, comment *issues_model.Comment, doer *user_model.User) (*api.PullReviewComment, error) {
apiComment := &api.PullReviewComment{
ID: comment.ID,
Body: comment.Content,
Poster: ToUser(ctx, comment.Poster, doer),
Resolver: ToUser(ctx, comment.ResolveDoer, doer),
ReviewID: review.ID,
Created: comment.CreatedUnix.AsTime(),
Updated: comment.UpdatedUnix.AsTime(),
Path: comment.TreePath,
CommitID: comment.CommitSHA,
OrigCommitID: comment.OldRef,
DiffHunk: patch2diff(comment.Patch),
HTMLURL: comment.HTMLURL(ctx),
HTMLPullURL: review.Issue.HTMLURL(),
}
if comment.Line < 0 {
apiComment.OldLineNum = comment.UnsignedLine()
} else {
apiComment.LineNum = comment.UnsignedLine()
}
return apiComment, nil
}
// ToPullReviewCommentList convert the CodeComments of an review to it's api format
func ToPullReviewCommentList(ctx context.Context, review *issues_model.Review, doer *user_model.User) ([]*api.PullReviewComment, error) {
if err := review.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
@ -92,26 +119,9 @@ func ToPullReviewCommentList(ctx context.Context, review *issues_model.Review, d
for _, lines := range review.CodeComments {
for _, comments := range lines {
for _, comment := range comments {
apiComment := &api.PullReviewComment{
ID: comment.ID,
Body: comment.Content,
Poster: ToUser(ctx, comment.Poster, doer),
Resolver: ToUser(ctx, comment.ResolveDoer, doer),
ReviewID: review.ID,
Created: comment.CreatedUnix.AsTime(),
Updated: comment.UpdatedUnix.AsTime(),
Path: comment.TreePath,
CommitID: comment.CommitSHA,
OrigCommitID: comment.OldRef,
DiffHunk: patch2diff(comment.Patch),
HTMLURL: comment.HTMLURL(ctx),
HTMLPullURL: review.Issue.HTMLURL(),
}
if comment.Line < 0 {
apiComment.OldLineNum = comment.UnsignedLine()
} else {
apiComment.LineNum = comment.UnsignedLine()
apiComment, err := ToPullReviewComment(ctx, review, comment, doer)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
apiComments = append(apiComments, apiComment)
}

6
services/pull/review.go
View file

@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
return nil, err
}
comment, err := createCodeComment(ctx,
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
doer,
issue.Repo,
issue,
@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
}
}
comment, err := createCodeComment(ctx,
comment, err := CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx,
doer,
issue.Repo,
issue,
@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ func CreateCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.
}
// createCodeComment creates a plain code comment at the specified line / path
func createCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, content, treePath string, line, reviewID int64) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
func CreateCodeCommentKnownReviewID(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, content, treePath string, line, reviewID int64) (*issues_model.Comment, error) {
var commitID, patch string
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("LoadPullRequest: %w", err)

65
templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl generated
View file

@ -11542,6 +11542,67 @@
"$ref": "#/responses/notFound"
}
}
},
"post": {
"produces": [
"application/json"
],
"tags": [
"repository"
],
"summary": "Add a new comment to a pull request review",
"operationId": "repoCreatePullReviewComment",
"parameters": [
{
"type": "string",
"description": "owner of the repo",
"name": "owner",
"in": "path",
"required": true
},
{
"type": "string",
"description": "name of the repo",
"name": "repo",
"in": "path",
"required": true
},
{
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64",
"description": "index of the pull request",
"name": "index",
"in": "path",
"required": true
},
{
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64",
"description": "id of the review",
"name": "id",
"in": "path",
"required": true
},
{
"name": "body",
"in": "body",
"required": true,
"schema": {
"$ref": "#/definitions/CreatePullReviewCommentOptions"
}
}
],
"responses": {
"200": {
"$ref": "#/responses/PullReviewComment"
},
"404": {
"$ref": "#/responses/notFound"
},
"422": {
"$ref": "#/responses/validationError"
}
}
}
},
"/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/reviews/{id}/dismissals": {
@ -18528,6 +18589,10 @@
},
"x-go-package": "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
},
"CreatePullReviewCommentOptions": {
"description": "CreatePullReviewCommentOptions are options to create a pull review comment",
"$ref": "#/definitions/CreatePullReviewComment"
},
"CreatePullReviewOptions": {
"description": "CreatePullReviewOptions are options to create a pull review",
"type": "object",

85
tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go
View file

@ -18,8 +18,93 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func TestAPIPullReviewCreateComment(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})
assert.NoError(t, pullIssue.LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
repo := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &repo_model.Repository{ID: pullIssue.RepoID})
username := "user2"
session := loginUser(t, username)
token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)
// as of e522e774cae2240279fc48c349fc513c9d3353ee
// There should be no reason for CreateComment to behave differently
// depending on the event associated with the review. But the logic of the implementation
// at this point in time is very involved and deserves these seemingly redundant
// test.
for _, event := range []api.ReviewStateType{
api.ReviewStatePending,
api.ReviewStateRequestChanges,
api.ReviewStateApproved,
api.ReviewStateComment,
} {
t.Run("Event_"+string(event), func(t *testing.T) {
path := "README.md"
var review api.PullReview
var reviewLine int64 = 1
{
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index), &api.CreatePullReviewOptions{
Body: "body1",
Event: event,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &review)
require.EqualValues(t, string(event), review.State)
require.EqualValues(t, 0, review.CodeCommentsCount)
}
{
req := NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index, review.ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var getReview api.PullReview
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &getReview)
require.EqualValues(t, getReview, review)
}
newCommentBody := "first new line"
{
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost, fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/comments", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index, review.ID), &api.CreatePullReviewCommentOptions{
Path: path,
Body: newCommentBody,
OldLineNum: reviewLine,
}).AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviewComment *api.PullReviewComment
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewComment)
assert.EqualValues(t, review.ID, reviewComment.ReviewID)
}
{
req := NewRequestf(t, http.MethodGet, "/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d/comments", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index, review.ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
var reviewComments []*api.PullReviewComment
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &reviewComments)
assert.Len(t, reviewComments, 2)
assert.EqualValues(t, existingCommentBody, reviewComments[0].Body)
assert.EqualValues(t, reviewComments[0].OldLineNum, reviewComments[1].OldLineNum)
assert.EqualValues(t, reviewComments[0].LineNum, reviewComments[1].LineNum)
assert.EqualValues(t, newCommentBody, reviewComments[1].Body)
assert.EqualValues(t, path, reviewComments[1].Path)
}
{
req := NewRequestf(t, http.MethodDelete, "/api/v1/repos/%s/pulls/%d/reviews/%d", repo.FullName(), pullIssue.Index, review.ID).
AddTokenAuth(token)
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusNoContent)
}
})
}
}
func TestAPIPullReview(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
pullIssue := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.Issue{ID: 3})