- This also means that if one of the test fails, it will actually
propagate to make and subsequently fail the test.
- Remove the 'delete duplicates issue users' code, I checked this
against my local development database (which contains quite bizarre
cases, even some that Forgejo does not like), my local instance database
and against Codeberg production and they all yielded no results to this
query, so I'm removing it thus resolving the error that the delete code
was not compatible with Mysql.
- Sync all tables that are requires by the migration in the test.
- Resolves#2206
(cherry picked from commit 8e02be7e89)
(cherry picked from commit 006f064416)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Unfortunately #21549 changed the name of Testcases without changing
their associated fixture directories.
Fix#21854
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_
## Context
In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:
- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)
## Proposed solution
Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).
This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.
As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):
The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.
## Questions
- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~
## Done as well:
- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there
_Closes #19872_
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.
> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
> maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
> confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
> **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4
> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.
Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1
> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message
Fixes#21299
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
When actions besides "delete" are performed on issues, the milestone
counter is updated. However, since deleting issues goes through a
different code path, the associated milestone's count wasn't being
updated, resulting in inaccurate counts until another issue in the same
milestone had a non-delete action performed on it.
I verified this change fixes the inaccurate counts using a local docker
build.
Fixes#21254
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
WebAuthn have updated their specification to set the maximum size of the
CredentialID to 1023 bytes. This is somewhat larger than our current
size and therefore we need to migrate.
The PR changes the struct to add CredentialIDBytes and migrates the CredentialID string
to the bytes field before another migration drops the old CredentialID field. Another migration
renames this field back.
Fix#20457
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
v208.go is seriously broken as it misses an ID() check. We need to no-op and remigrate all of the u2f keys.
See #18756
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Unfortunately credentialIDs in u2f are 255 bytes long which with base32 encoding
becomes 408 bytes. The default size of a xorm string field is only a VARCHAR(255)
This problem is not apparent on SQLite because strings get mapped to TEXT there.
Fix#18727
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
`models` does far too much. In particular it handles all `UserSignin`.
It shouldn't be responsible for calling LDAP, SMTP or PAM for signing in.
Therefore we should move this code out of `models`.
This code has to depend on `models` - therefore it belongs in `services`.
There is a package in `services` called `auth` and clearly this functionality belongs in there.
Plan:
- [x] Change `auth.Auth` to `auth.Method` - as they represent methods of authentication.
- [x] Move `models.UserSignIn` into `auth`
- [x] Move `models.ExternalUserLogin`
- [x] Move most of the `LoginVia*` methods to `auth` or subpackages
- [x] Move Resynchronize functionality to `auth`
- Involved some restructuring of `models/ssh_key.go` to reduce the size of this massive file and simplify its files.
- [x] Move the rest of the LDAP functionality in to the ldap subpackage
- [x] Re-factor the login sources to express an interfaces `auth.Source`?
- I've done this through some smaller interfaces Authenticator and Synchronizable - which would allow us to extend things in future
- [x] Now LDAP is out of models - need to think about modules/auth/ldap and I think all of that functionality might just be moveable
- [x] Similarly a lot Oauth2 functionality need not be in models too and should be moved to services/auth/source/oauth2
- [x] modules/auth/oauth2/oauth2.go uses xorm... This is naughty - probably need to move this into models.
- [x] models/oauth2.go - mostly should be in modules/auth/oauth2 or services/auth/source/oauth2
- [x] More simplifications of login_source.go may need to be done
- Allow wiring in of notify registration - *this can now easily be done - but I think we should do it in another PR* - see #16178
- More refactors...?
- OpenID should probably become an auth Method but I think that can be left for another PR
- Methods should also probably be cleaned up - again another PR I think.
- SSPI still needs more refactors.* Rename auth.Auth auth.Method
* Restructure ssh_key.go
- move functions from models/user.go that relate to ssh_key to ssh_key
- split ssh_key.go to try create clearer function domains for allow for
future refactors here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Create Proper Migration tests
Unfortunately our testing regime has so far meant that migrations do not
get proper testing.
This PR begins the process of creating migration tests for this.
* Add test for v176
* fix mssql drop db
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
