mirror of
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo.git
synced 2024-11-24 03:21:49 +01:00
ec8ea58dbe
Mainstream frameworks: * https://getbootstrap.com/docs/5.0/components/buttons/ * https://primer.style/css/components/buttons#link-button * https://nextui.org/docs/components/button#light * https://coreui.io/react/docs/components/button/ * https://design-system.hpe.design/components/button * https://chakra-ui.com/docs/components/button/usage#button-variants * https://mui.com/material-ui/react-button/ All (at least most?) of them make "link" button have "underline" when hovering. So, a "link" is a "link", when it's hovered, it should have the underline by default. To be strict, Gitea's "button-link" is not link-style, so it needs a better name. Actually, for the "plain" button, there are some different approaches: * Some frameworks just make "default" button as no style (not feasible in Gitea/Fomantic UI) * Primer uses "btn-invisible", which is not a proper word * NextUI uses "light", which is not a proper word, either ... * CoreUI / ChakraUI uses "ghost", I think this name is acceptable. Welcome to suggest better name for such button. Or, we just call it ".button-plain" or ".button-simple", in fact I prefer such simple and clear name. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| chroma | ||
| code | ||
| codemirror | ||
| console | ||
| editor | ||
| features | ||
| markup | ||
| modules | ||
| repository | ||
| shared | ||
| standalone | ||
| themes | ||
| admin.css | ||
| animations.css | ||
| base.css | ||
| dashboard.css | ||
| editor.css | ||
| explore.css | ||
| font_i18n.css | ||
| form.css | ||
| helpers.css | ||
| home.css | ||
| index.css | ||
| install.css | ||
| organization.css | ||
| repository.css | ||
| review.css | ||
| runner.css | ||
| svg.css | ||
| tribute.css | ||
| user.css | ||